I love comics. At least I used to before Monday.
I'd finished reading The Passage - a well written, non-Twilight, vampire horror novel. It was great. The story world was compelling and there were some good characters and a ripping story. A real page turner.
When I finished it, I thought how good it was and also how long it took - 750 pages over 2 weeks. It was densely packed and involved.
I thought of my favourite comics, say The Punisher, In The Beginning, by Garth Ennis. I think on balance, Punisher fans would have got more out of a 750 page written novel. Think of the amount of character exploring you could do. Nicky Cavela's backstory, the Company's deliberations etc. Could have been fantastic, but it was a comic and ideas in comics can only go so deep.
What we get in a comic is impact - and accessible engagement. It's not just the digestibility but the jaw dropping punch that you get (especially in Ennis' pacing) when you turn a page. Books cannot do that, but on balance I would rather have the slower burning effects of a page of prose and their lasting effects than an impactful end panel that lands it's case quickly but forgetably.
For those of you that know me and my love of comics will know that I am a bit disturbed by all this - but to continue -
I'm thinking the same with information graphics - are they just adverts for the text experience?(When there is one) If they are useful software then they are obviously an experience in themselves.
Pictures have momentary attraction but a thin capacity for information and importantly, ideas.
Prose on the other hand absorbs ideas like blotting paper and retells them with a lasting sophistication.